About your Search

20130416
20130424
Search Results 0 to 1 of about 2
it was like 1988, i think, '85 or '88, bid mar v. vinson, in a dissent, says this is historically not credible. this is not what they meant when they passed the first amendment, and he went through right down the line what they meant, and the first amendment was simply that the congress shall not establish a nationa church. that's all they meant. they did not mean we had a secularizing state. and, unfortunately, that has become the law. that is, that's the way we think of things now. people think of jefferson's words before they even know what is in the first amendment, and i'm arguing for the radical -- well, i'm arguing for the radical position. but that's william rehnquist's position. he's, of course, deceased. that everson was bad law. it should be thrown out. all those establishment cases should be just chucked. they're confused -- they're too confused to be able to rectify, and a sign of that is the court itself can't figure out how to balance the establishment clause and freedom of religion clause, free exercise clause. they get continually entangled on their own feet. so that's the mor
of that? what is beautiful about that? i conclude a mars cyst because the state will take care of my neighbor. cohad a huge demonstration on behalf of legal marijuana. wow. if my child had gone to a, let's celebrate legalized marijuana i would have believed i failed as a parent utterly. the mass simple involved here, that is what preoccupies you. you're now a free to get high on marijuana. just think about what animates a lot of people? it's just painful, frankly. so, this -- and social darwinism? is this what the left uses to attack the belief -- i don't even know what belief they're attacking. what about social darwinism? that the talented and the harder working get ahead? why is that darwinism? why didn't that merit? i have in there from -- i believe it's a harvard economist, a princeton economist actually. man won a nobel peace nobel pri. and he shows how much more television poorer people watch than richer people, because richer people don't have the time to watch tv. they work so hard to get ahead. this doesn't mean that poor people don't work hard but on average, in america, b
Search Results 0 to 1 of about 2

Terms of Use (10 Mar 2001)